Trying to bring environmental issue in the decision process TUNA 25:12

 

Rule of Law prescribes the response to the citizens' request for information and non/discrimination

list of documents

   

2023-01-10

Dear Mr. Jörgen Hanan, Jorgen.hanak@landskrona.se, Miljöchef (responsible for the environment on the Island of Ven) Dear Mr Johan Nilsson, johan.nilsson@landskrona.se, Förvaltningschef Dear Ms Carina Leffler, carina.leffler@landskrona.se, Stadsledningsförvaltningen Dear Ms Boel Kvist, boel.kvist@landskrona.se, ,Chef för juridiska avdelningen Dear Mr. cab-sinkevicius-contact@ec.europa.eu,, Virginijus Sinkevičius Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Dear Ms. Rozalina Petrova, rozalina.petrova@ec.europa.eu, Plastic Free Oceans Now at the Swedish UN presidency we will bring the issue of the contamination of the seas especailly Öresund to the international attention. We need specific information, please see the attached Tweet. www.ecolanum.org/index.html#plastic www.ecolanum.org A screenshot of a tweet related to the issue see blow hashtag #EU2023SE

 

grannehörande  TUNA 25-12 2021 både TUNA 25.12 and vår tomt, som var en enhet, är kontaminerade med mikroplast	synpunkter se under Contamination TUNA 25.12 är kontaminerad med mikroplast	myndigheternas svar ställningstagandet

 

chrono Short chronology of TUNA 25:12 1 there is a series of problems with the enterprise "Get Ost"  owned by Glenn and Ninna Björne since beginning of 2000 2 at that time 25:12 and 32:2 have the same owner Glenn and Nina Björne 3 during the time preceeding 2017 there are  some health inspections on the property . 4 in 2017 Kjell Anselius, neighboring 25:12 reported a garbage, ensilage mixed with the manure being deposited on the 25:12 5 the property 32:3 is sold and 25:12 remains in the hands of Glenn and Nina Björne. 6 the problems with the removal of the manure and ensilage plastic are mounting 7 on 2018-01-18 Glenn and Nina Björne transfer  the ownership of the 25:12  to their son Lucas Björne. At that time both Lucas and Glenn Björne are in debt. At this point the Lándskrona authorities should had reacted. 8 at some point the property 25:12 is sold by Lucas Björne to David Andreen, the current owner who tries to sell part of the property further. 9 comments ref  7,  how was it possible that Glenn and Nina Björne were able to transfer the property to their son despite that they were in debt, thus escaping the responsibility for the contamination of the properties 25:12  and 32:3

 

 

  

disrespectfully mocking a citizen, is not worthy of the Swedish administration culture correspondence with Mr. Hanak kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250   correspondence with Mr. Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering something else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach.   Let's follow it step by step       hela e-mail   the answer of Mr Hanak        the COMMENTS TO THE ANSWER I assume Mr. Hanak thinks I am a cognitively impaired and responds with an irrelevant e-mail, absolutely no reference to the question above, see it despite that I attach a photo of the ensilage pile, the photo is made by  Kjell Anselius   below the photo of 25:12 taken by Mr. Aselius from his property in 2017         let's help mr. Hanak , the photo is taken by Kjell Anselius from the house as on the picture below, the complatn is made by Anselius 2022-04-10 see below

 

the first attemt to get an answer from mr Hanak and the first "confusing answer"       correspondence with mr Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering someting else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach. Let's follow step by step to Hanak 2022-05-17 no answer   hanak_req_info_2022-05-24 to Hanak, reminder 2022-05-24 from Hanak 2022-05-24 Mr Hanak refers to anther property not the property I ask for i.e. 25:12 he removes the e-mail with the question  so  nobody sees that he just trying to confuse the citizen.

     

manure_on_25-12

Short chronology

in 2017 Kjell Anselius, neighbouring 25:12 reported a garbage, ensilage mixed with the manure being deposited on the 25:12 at some poing 25:12 and 32:3 had one owner Glenn and Ninna Bj;rne there is a long series of dating many years back in 2017 Kjell Anselius, neighbouring 25:12 reported a garbage, ensilage mixed with the manure being deposited on the 25:12

 

disrespectfully mocking a citizen, is not worthy of the Swedish administration culture correspondence with Mr. Hanak kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250   correspondence with Mr. Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering something else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach. Let's follow it step by step     to Hanak 2022-05-24   the answer of Mr Hanak      from Hanak 2022-05-24 the COMMENTS TO THE ANSWER I assume Mr. Hanak thinks I am a cognitively impaired and responds with an irrelevant e-mail, absolutely no reference to the question above, see it despite that I attach a photo of the ensilage pile, the photo is made by  Kjell Anselius   below the photo of 25:12 taken by Mr. Aselius from his property in 2017 here is the photo made by Kjell Aselius the neighbour rapporting ensilage storage on the property 25:12       let's help mr. Hanak , the photo is taken by Kjell Anselius from the house as on the picture below, the complatn is made by Anselius 2022-04-10 see below   here is the clear reference to the issue

 

the first attemt to get an answer from mr Hanak and the first "confusing answer"       correspondence with mr Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering someting else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach. Let's follow step by step to Hanak 2022-05-17 no answer to Hanak, reminder 2022-05-24 from Hanak 2022-05-24 Mr Hanak refers to anther property not the property I ask for i.e. 25:12 he removes the e-mail with the question  so  nobody sees that he just trying to confuse the citizen.

 

ABOUT: TUNA 25:12 BYGG 2021.68 and BYGG 2021.69 kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250   we at 32:3 did not allow to dig in manure/silage plastic as we want to have a proper disposal of the plastic not threatening he ecology of  Ven and Öresund. The plastic at 25:12 was dig down somewhere, see the photo of Mr. Aselius   major consideration   we do not consent with the decision   no decision papers and justifications regarding above case where provided to me and I had no chance to exercise basic civil rights.   administrative weakness, information is only sent by registered letters. If citizen is not available at the living location the citizens civil rights are neglected