We are using terminology and the legal definitions from the following document. The definition are broader then usually applied including favorism. click on the lable right.

 

TUNA 25:12 BYGG 2021.68 2021.69
major consideration  
we do not concent with the decision
no decision pepars and justifications regarding above case where provided to me and I had no chance to exercice basic civil rights.
 
 

 

fooling and  ignoring citizens,
correspondence with mr Hanak
  correspondence with mr Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering someting else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach.
Let's follow it step by step
to Hanak 2022-05-24
the entire e-mail 
from Hanak
2022-05-24
I assume Mr Hanak and responds with a bla bla e-mail, absolutely no reference to the question above, see it
despite that I attach a photo of the ensilage pile, the photo is made by  Kjell Anselius

here uis the photo made byu Kjell Aselius
  let help mr. Hanak , the photo is taken by Kjell Anselius from the house as on the picture below, the complatn is made by Anselius 2022-04-10 see below
   
 
   
here is the clear reference to the issue
   
      

 

 

 

 
  ignoring citizens, correspondence with mr Hanak  
  correspondence with mr Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering someting else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach.  
Let's follow step by step
to Hanak 2022-05-17 no answer  
to Hanak, reminder 2022-05-24  
from Hanak
2022-05-24
Mr Hanak refers to anther property not the property I ask for i.e. 25:12
he removes the e-mail with the question  so  nobody sees that he just trying to confuse the citizen.
     
   
  THE COMMUNICATION RQUEST FOR  THE FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION ENABLING TO EXERCICE CITIZENS' RIGHTS.
a fundamental request underlying democratic rights
point 1 and 2 relate to the case Tuna 25-12

point 3 relates to the caseTuna 25-12 and Tuna 89-5