original English, legally binding version
the Swedish informal google translation below |
I. With regards to the Swedish
Administration law (FÖRVALTNINGSLAGEN), see above and EU regulation
outlining responsibilities for the protection of
whistleblowers and the relevant rules and procedures, I
would like to formally report Jörgen Hanak, the head of the
environment department at the Miljöförvaltningen (Environmental
Board) in Landskrona for the following transgression. |
II. The head of Environmental Protection
for the commune of Landskrona has, over the past four years,
placed limitations on my civil rights and impeded my
freedom, which are guaranteed by our liberal democracy. This
has been done in an attempt to silence my criticism of the
inadequate management of environmental issues, which I have
expressed on various websites and social media platforms,
namely www.ecolanum.org
www.ecolanum.com , and
www.venusia.se .
Mr.
Jörgen Hanak's actions can be interpreted as an infringement
on my freedom of speech and expression. It has been noted by
his former subordinates that Mr. Hanak tends to adopt an
authoritarian mindset, mistakenly conflating the principles
of a capitalistic liberal democracy with the Jantelagen (the
law of Jante, which can be explored through the English
version on Wikipedia). |
III. Consequently, he resorts to
intimidation and harassment based on personal biases and
dislikes. For several years, Mr. Hanak has neglected to
respond to inquiries to provide information regarding
progres in the decontamination and the evaluations and
actions to address this issue. Such actions violate the Rule
of Law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Additionally, Mr. Hanak was unsuccessful in recovering SEK
2.4 million that the previous owner, who was accountable for
the contamination (as the owner of the goat farm), illicitly
transferred to his son in an attempt to conceal these funds.
This mismanagement is deeply regrettable. Due to Mr. Hanak's
restrictions on our civil rights, I have endured both
psychological suffering and financial harm. |
IV. in particular; |
1. The plaintiff has experienced
harm and damages.
1.a. Procedures were implemented without informing the
plaintiff about the progress or conclusions. This lack of
communication resulted in punitive and unfair actions being
taken without dialogue.
1.b. Due to a lack of information, the plaintiff was unable
to protect his interests and defend himself what is a
violation of principles of democracy.
1.c. The treatment the plaintiff received can be
characterized as intimidating, harassing, and bullying by
Jörgen Hanak.
1.d. The actions of Jörgen Hanak from Miljöförvaltingen have
caused the plaintiff psychological distress and financial
losses. The affected areas, including the arch halls, were
rendered unusable.
2: There is a breach of civil rights closely connected to
personal suffering and harassment, which stems from the
administrative failures and mismanagement by Jörgen Hanak.
2.a. Failure to prevent and address contamination resulting
from the previous owner's animal holdings, despite written
reports as early as 2015.
2.b. Failure to secure resources for cleaning up the silage
contamination, where the previous owner had possession of
SEK 2.4 million. Additionally, the previous owner's adjacent
property' TUNA 25:12 was illegally transferred
by the previous owner to his son in an attempt to conceal
those funds. |
V. The mismanagement caused by Jörgen
Hanak has put at risk and infringed upon the fundamental
civil rights and personal freedoms granted by our capitalist
liberal democracy. This situation is resulting in a
deterioration of the environment and causing financial
losses for plentiff who is unable to utilize certain
facilities and areas of the property. The lack of respect
for citizens from the side of Mr Hanak is rooted in
significant administrative failures that have resulted in
abuses of power and violations of civil rights. The
injustice and erosion of trust in the state and its
authorities cannot be easily rectified. |
VI. This report concerns his refusal to
provide information regarding my property, which I believe
constitutes a violation of human and civil rights. I also
believe that Mr. Hanak's actions may be considered a
violation of the EU charter of fundamental rights, which has
precedence in Swedish legislation. |
VII. Moreover, I would like to bring to your attention the fact
that Mr. Hanak has disregarded court orders and shown
personal aggression through harassment. Despite other courts
determining the previous owner, Glenn Björne (owner of the
goat farm), as responsible for the contamination, Mr. Hanak
has engaged in intimidation and personal harassment as if it
were a personal vendetta.
To summarize, the issues at hand involve abuse of power,
harassment, and the disregard of court decisions.
(violation of the Swedish State rules) |
|
|