HOME      

Trying to bring environmental issue in the decision process

summery of links to various information Index_list.html   Index_plast.html historical data  related to the previous contamination and request for information regarding sell of 25:12 Ven-adm-links.html   Index_25.html   Index_2022-05-24.html   Index_2022-05-25.html

 

an ecological scandal Landskrona TUNA 25:12

 

grannehörande  TUNA 25-12 BYGG:2021.68 and BYGG:2021.69 25:12 and 32:3 were the same combined and owned by Glenn Björne

grannehörande  TUNA 25-12 2021   Due to the negligence of the "miljö"-environmental authorities in Landskrona the major contamination was allowed to proceed under 20 years and the culpable för the contamination Glenn Björne was illigaly to transfer property to his son Lucas Björne thus escaping responsibility of cleaning the micro plastics   vi   varnade mydigheterna vad som sker

 

an introduction to corruption Landskrona TUNA 89:5

 

grannehörande  TUNA 89-5 2022

grannehörande  TUNA 89-5 2022 bedrägeri och förfalskning av dokument. There are good reason to suspect that the process was manipulated and an incorrect information was provided to one or more of the participants.

 

BYGG 2021.68 and BYGG 2021.69 kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250

   

protocol 2022-01-26 dokument relaterad till anmärkningar om Tuna 25:12 och Tuna 32:3 history 2015-2017 Historien av Tuna 25:12, korrespondens med Miljöchef Jörgen Hanak   Grannehörande begäran från stadsarkitekts-avdelningen Datum 2022-02-17 grannehörande 89-5 2022   democracy Svar från Tuna 32:3 Datum 2021-03-02 grannehörande 25-12-2021 Svar från Tuna 32:3 Datum 2022-01-04 grannehörande 89-5-2021 svar från Tuna 32:3 Datum 2022-03-04 grannehörande 89-5-2022 corespondence with Mr. Hanak index to_hanak_2022-05-17 hanak_from_2022-05-25   postings on twitter index   Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4   remiss_2022-44 protokoll 2022-04-26 svar till ansökan TUNA 89:5 BYGG 2021.819 2021-01-10 remiss 2021-819 neclection of citizen rights, communication with Ms. Warming May 2022 tuna 25-12 comparing 2 different evaluations tuna 89-5   ven-admin-links   index plast   index_2022-05-24.html   index_2022-05-25.html   index_25.html

 

TWITTER - Tweets by ecolanum -

   

Short chronology

in 2017 Kjell Anselius, neighbouring 25:12 reported a garbage, ensilage mixed with the manure being deposited on the 25:12 at some poing 25:12 and 32:3 had one owner Glenn and Ninna Bj;rne there is a long series of dating many years back in 2017 Kjell Anselius, neighbouring 25:12 reported a garbage, ensilage mixed with the manure being deposited on the 25:12

 

disrespectfully mocking a citizen, is not worthy of the Swedish administration culture correspondence with Mr. Hanak kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250 Let's follow it step by step     to Hanak 2022-05-24 the entire e-mail the answer of Mr Hanak        below the photo of 25:12 taken by Mr. Anselius from his property in 2017 here is the photo made by Kjell Anselius the neighbour rapporting ensilage storage on the property 25:12 The photo is taken by Kjell Anselius from the house as on the picture below, the complatn is made by Anselius 2017-04-10 see below    under the view alligned with above photo direction            here is the clear reference to the issue

the first attemt to get an answer from mr Hanak and the first "confusing answer"       correspondence with mr Hanak, as one can see Mr. Hanak deflects the question by answering someting else. In order to confuse the citizen Mr. Hanak in a response doesn't include the original e-mail  where there is a question. Very clever way to to fool citizens what I know from the countries where I have worked with Mr. Hans Blix. The same approach. Let's follow step by step to Hanak 2022-05-17 no answer to Hanak, reminder 2022-05-24 from Hanak 2022-05-24 Mr Hanak refers to anther property not the property I ask for i.e. 25:12 he removes the e-mail with the question  so  nobody sees that he just trying to confuse the citizen .

 

ABOUT: TUNA 25:12 BYGG 2021.68 and BYGG 2021.69 kronofogdens målnummer U-18091-22/1250 we at 32:3 did not allow to dig in manure/silage plastic as we want to have a proper disposal of the plastic not threatening he ecology of  Ven and Öresund. The plastic at 25:12 was dig down somewhere, see the photo of Mr. Anselius   major consideration   we do not consent with the decision   no decision papers and justifications regarding above case where provided to me and I had no chance to exercise basic civil rights.   administrative weakness, information is only sent by registered letters. If citizen is not available at the living location the citizens civil rights are neglected